4.7 Article

Initial Morphology and Feedback Effects on Laser-Induced Periodic Nanostructuring of Thin-Film Metallic Glasses

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11051076

关键词

thin film metallic glasses; femtosecond laser; LIPSS; surface functionalization; nanostructuring

资金

  1. ANR project MEGALIT of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-18-CE08-0018]
  2. project FORMEL of the Pack Ambition Research program of the Auvergne Rhone-Alpes Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface nanostructuring by femtosecond laser is an efficient way to manipulate surface topography and create advanced functionalities. Thin-film metallic glasses obtained by physical vapor deposition exhibit unique properties making them resilient to laser-induced nanopatterns. The morphological response of Zr65Cu35 alloys under ultrafast irradiation and the use of double pulses femtosecond laser are critical for forming uniform nanostructures in materials with poor predisposition.
Surface nanostructuring by femtosecond laser is an efficient way to manipulate surface topography, creating advanced functionalities of irradiated materials. Thin-film metallic glasses obtained by physical vapor deposition exhibit microstructures free from grain boundaries, crystallites and dislocations but also characterized by a nanometric surface roughness. These singular properties make them more resilient to other metals to form laser-induced nanopatterns. Here we investigate the morphological response of Zr65Cu35 alloys under ultrafast irradiation with multipulse feedback. We experimentally demonstrate that the initial columnar microstructure affects the surface topography evolution and conditions the required energy dose to reach desired structures in the nanoscale domain. Double pulses femtosecond laser irradiation is also shown to be an efficient strategy to force materials to form uniform nanostructures even when their thermomechanical properties have a poor predisposition to generate them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据