4.7 Article

Polystyrene Thin Films Nanostructuring by UV Femtosecond Laser Beam: From One Spot to Large Surface

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11051060

关键词

polymer thin films; femtosecond beam; laser texturing; LSFL; 2D LIPSS; substrate temperature effect; scanning processing

资金

  1. Region Centre-Val-de-Loire (French Government) through the national project APR-IA [201900134921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, regular periodic nanostructures were successfully created on polystyrene thin films through direct irradiation by a Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser beam under different conditions. It was observed that the surface morphology is dependent on the number of pulses, laser beam fluence, and substrate temperature.
In this work, direct irradiation by a Ti:Sapphire (100 fs) femtosecond laser beam at third harmonic (266 nm), with a moderate repetition rate (50 and 1000 Hz), was used to create regular periodic nanostructures upon polystyrene (PS) thin films. Typical Low Spatial Frequency LIPSSs (LSFLs) were obtained for 50 Hz, as well as for 1 kHz, in cases of one spot zone, and also using a line scanning irradiation. Laser beam fluence, repetition rate, number of pulses (or irradiation time), and scan velocity were optimized to lead to the formation of various periodic nanostructures. It was found that the surface morphology of PS strongly depends on the accumulation of a high number of pulses (10(3) to 10(7) pulses) at low energy (1 to 20 mu J/pulse). Additionally, heating the substrate from room temperature up to 97 degrees C during the laser irradiation modified the ripples' morphology, particularly their amplitude enhancement from 12 nm (RT) to 20 nm. Scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy were used to image the morphological features of the surface structures. Laser-beam scanning at a chosen speed allowed for the generation of well-resolved ripples on the polymer film and homogeneity over a large area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据