4.5 Article

The Relationship between Surface and In-Depth Hardness for the Nitrocarburizing Treatment Process

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11050812

关键词

surface hardness; in-depth hardness; surface heat treatment; nitriding; nitrocarburizing

资金

  1. [1.3.1-VKE-2017-00025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the mutual connection between surface and in-depth hardness values in surface-treated metal samples with inhomogeneous hardness distribution. Results show that heat treatment outcomes can be rapidly checked through surface hardness testing, and cross-sectional hardness distribution can be estimated based on surface hardness data.
The aim of this study is to exhibit the mutual connection between surface and in depth hardness values in the case of surface-treated metal samples with inhomogeneous hardness distribution in the surface layer. The reason for surface treatments of metal alloys is most commonly to increase the hardness and wear resistance at the surface. Case depth, as a result of surface treatment and the in-depth hardness distribution, can be determined by measuring the hardness of a section perpendicular to the treated surface and by metallographic examination. The result of heat treatment can also be checked rapidly by surface hardness testing. Surface hardness carries only indirect information regarding case depth and hardness distribution. Surface and cross-sectional hardness can be related to the mathematical modeling of the plastic zone developing in the indentation process. The mathematical model applied in this study allows the conversion of the surface hardness function into the in-depth hardness function and vice-versa. The calculation method presented was validated by analyzing the hardness data of nitrocarburized samples of various case depths. The validation result proves that cross-sectional hardness distribution can be adequately estimated by surface hardness data in the case of a surface layer with monotonically decreasing hardness distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据