4.4 Article

A study on multiform multi-objective evolutionary optimization

期刊

MEMETIC COMPUTING
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 307-318

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12293-021-00331-y

关键词

Evolutionary optimization; Multiform optimization; Multi-objective optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study on multiform multi-objective evolutionary optimization, which aims to construct multiple forms of a given MOP and simultaneously optimize them using evolutionary search to enhance multi-objective optimization performance. Comprehensive empirical studies were conducted to evaluate the proposed multiform paradigm for multi-objective optimization.
Multi-objective optimization problem (MOP) denotes the optimization problem involving more than one objective function to be optimized simultaneously. In the literature, to solve MOP, evolutionary algorithm has been recognized as an effective approach. Over the years, a number of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been developed. In this paper, we present a study on multiform multi-objective evolutionary optimization. In contrast to existing MOEAs, which only focus on the optimization of a single MOP, the proposed new paradigm considers to construct multiple forms of a given MOP, which may contain different useful information for solving the MOP. The evolutionary search is then performed on both the given MOP and the constructed forms concurrently. By transferring useful traits found along the evolutionary search across the given MOP and the built problem forms, enhanced multi-objective optimization performance can be obtained. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing work that considers the multiform optimization for solving MOP. To evaluate the performance of the proposed multiform paradigm for multi-objective optimization, comprehensive empirical studies with commonly used MOP benchmarks using different existing MOEAs as the basic MOP solvers are conducted and analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据