4.2 Article

Eye-movements can help disentangle mechanisms underlying disfluency

期刊

LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1038-1055

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1905166

关键词

Disfluency; eye tracking; connected speech; lexical access; network task

资金

  1. H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [832298]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [832298] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers linked the pattern of disfluency in production to difficulties at specific levels, using a Network Task. By combining this paradigm with eye-tracking, they were able to differentiate disfluencies related to word preparation difficulties from other types of disfluencies. The study showed that lexical selection difficulty led to self-corrections and pauses before naming.
To reveal the underlying cause of disfluency, several authors related the pattern of disfluencies to difficulties at specific levels of production, using a Network Task. Given that disfluencies are multifactorial, we combined this paradigm with eye-tracking to disentangle disfluency related to word preparation difficulties from others (e.g. stalling strategies). We manipulated lexical and grammatical selection difficulty. In Experiment 1, lines connecting the pictures varied in length, which led participants to use a strategy and inspect other areas than the upcoming picture when pictures were preceded by long lines. Experiment 2 only used short lines. In both experiments, lexical selection difficulty promoted self-corrections, pauses and longer fixation latency prior to naming. Multivariate Pattern Analyses demonstrated that disfluency and eye-movement data patterns can predict lexical selection difficulty. Eye-tracking could provide complementary information about network tasks, by disentangling disfluencies related to picture naming from disfluencies related to self-monitoring or stalling strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据