4.1 Review

Second-Line Surgical Management After Midurethral Sling Failure

期刊

INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 111-118

出版社

KOREAN CONTINENCE SOC
DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040278.139

关键词

Urinary incontinence; Suburethral sling; Recurrence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The midurethral sling is widely used for stress urinary incontinence, but has a failure rate of 5%-20%. There are no clear guidelines for second-line management, but options include bulking agent injections, tape shortening, repeat MUS, PVS, and colposuspension. Repeat MUS is the most commonly used second-line surgical method, while PVS and colposuspension without synthetic mesh are preferred for patients with prior mesh-related complications. A readjustable sling may be a better option for patients with detrusor underactivity.
Currently, the midurethral sling (MUS) is widely used as a standard treatment in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Several studies have reported the failure rate of MUS to be approximately 5%-20%. In general, sling failure can be defined as persistent SUI after surgery or a temporary improvement in incontinence followed by recurrence. Failure is also often considered to include cases requiring secondary surgery due to mesh exposure, postoperative voiding difficulty, de novo urgency/urge incontinence, and severe postoperative pain. Because of the lack of large-scale, high-quality research on this topic, no clear guidelines exist for second-line management. To date, transurethral bulking agent injections, tape shortening, repeat MUS, pubovaginal sling (PVS) using autologous fascia, and Burch colposuspension are available options for second-line surgery. Repeat MUS is the most widely used second-line surgical method at present. Bulking agent injections have lower durability and efficacy than other treatments. Tape shortening demonstrates a relatively low success rate, but comparable outcomes if the period from first treatment to relapse is short. In patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency PVS and retropubic (RP) MUS can be considered first as second-line management because of their higher success rate than other treatments. When revision or reoperation is required due to prior mesh-related complications, PVS or colposuspension, which is performed without a synthetic mesh, is appropriate for second-line surgery. For patients with detrusor underactivity, a readjustable sling can be a better option because of the high risk of postoperative voiding dysfunction in PVS or RP slings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据