4.6 Article

Noninvasive Prenatal Paternity Testing with a Combination of Well-Established SNP and STR Markers Using Massively Parallel Sequencing

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12030454

关键词

forensic genetics; noninvasive prenatal paternity testing; short tandem repeat; single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971798]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A15150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma to perform noninvasive prenatal paternity testing using a combination of SNP and STR markers, showing promising results for future applications.
Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal plasma has made it possible to develop noninvasive prenatal paternity testing (NIPPT). However, most studies have focused on customized single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing systems and few have used conventional short tandem repeat (STR) markers. Based on massively parallel sequencing (MPS), this study used a widely-accepted forensic multiplex assay system to evaluate the effect of noninvasive prenatal paternity testing with a combination of well-established SNP and STR markers. Using a ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit, NIPPT was performed in 17 real parentage cases with monovular unborn fetuses at 7 to 24 gestational weeks. Different analytical strategies for the identification of paternally inherited allele (PIA) were developed to deal with SNPs and STRs. Combined paternity index (CPI) for 17 real trios as well as 272 unrelated trios was calculated. With the combination of SNPs and A-STRs, 82.35% (14/17), 88.24% (15/17), 94.12% (16/17), and 94.12% (16/17) of real trios could be accurately determined when the likelihood ratio (LR) threshold for paternity inclusion was set to 10,000, 1000, 100, and 10, respectively. This reveals that simultaneous surveys of SNP and STR markers included in the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit offer a promising method for NIPPT using MPS technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据