4.7 Review

Efficacy and Safety of Veverimer in the Treatment of Metabolic Acidosis Caused by Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-analysis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643128

关键词

metabolic acidosis; chronic kidney disease; serum bicarbonate; veverimer; meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Veverimer is effective in increasing bicarbonate levels and improving physical function in CKD patients with metabolic acidosis, compared to placebo, with similar safety profiles. Further research is needed to compare long-term veverimer use with traditional alkali therapy.
Metabolic acidosis is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Veverimer is an orally administrated, free amine polymer with high capacity and binding selectivity to hydrochloric acid from the gastrointestinal tract. This study pooled the current evidence of the efficacy and safety of veverimer for the treatment of metabolic acidosis associated with CKD. We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in June 2020. In this study, three RCTs with 548 patients were included in our analysis. The analysis revealed that veverimer was associated with increased bicarbonate level of patients (weight mean difference [WMD] 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.40, 3.77], p < 0.001) and improved physical function compared with placebo measured by Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short Form 36, question 3 (physical functioning domain) (KDQoL-PFD) score (WMD 5.25, 95% CI [1.58, 8.92], p = 0.005). For safety outcomes, both groups exhibited similar risks for developing headache, diarrhea, flatulence, and hyperkalemia. In conclusion, current clinical evidence indicates that veverimer is efficacious and safe against metabolic acidosis related to CKD compared with placebo. Further research comparing long-term veverimer use with traditional alkali therapy is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据