4.6 Review

Strategies to Refine Gastric Stimulation and Pacing Protocols: Experimental and Modeling Approaches

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.645472

关键词

stimulation; pacing; gastric motility; slow wave; biophysical model; mathematical model

资金

  1. Marsden Fund Council
  2. Medical Technologies Centre of Research Excellence (MedTech CoRE)
  3. Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 HD088662, OT2OD030538]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the use of gastric pacing and stimulation strategies in treating motility disorders, as well as targeting nerves in the stomach to modulate stomach function. The article summarizes effective parameters and limitations in existing studies, and explores the use of mathematical models to refine pacing and stimulation protocols. Additionally, future directions and challenges in this field are also discussed.
Gastric pacing and stimulation strategies were first proposed in the 1960s to treat motility disorders. However, there has been relatively limited clinical translation of these techniques. Experimental investigations have been critical in advancing our understanding of the control mechanisms that innervate gut function. In this review, we will discuss the use of pacing to modulate the rhythmic slow wave conduction patterns generated by interstitial cells of Cajal in the gastric musculature. In addition, the use of gastric high-frequency stimulation methods that target nerves in the stomach to either inhibit or enhance stomach function will be discussed. Pacing and stimulation protocols to modulate gastric activity, effective parameters and limitations in the existing studies are summarized. Mathematical models are useful to understand complex and dynamic systems. A review of existing mathematical models and techniques that aim to help refine pacing and stimulation protocols are provided. Finally, some future directions and challenges that should be investigated are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据