4.5 Article

Altered Relationship Between Parvalbumin and Perineuronal Nets in an Autism Model

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.597812

关键词

parvalbumin; perineuronal net; autism spectrum disorder; valproic acid; chondroitinase ABC

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [82003555]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672744, 2020TQ0135]
  3. [2019SHIBS0004]
  4. [SZBL2019062801003]
  5. [KQTD2015032709315529]
  6. [SZSM201612036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Altered function of inhibitory neurons, particularly the PV-containing neurons with reduced density and intensity, is observed in ASD patients and model mice. The relationship between PV and PNN intensities is disrupted in VPA mice, which can be corrected by reducing PNN levels, indicating a potential contribution to the pathology of ASD.
Altered function or presence of inhibitory neurons is documented in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but the mechanism underlying this alternation is poorly understood. One major subtype of inhibitory neurons altered is the parvalbumin (PV)-containing neurons with reduced density and intensity in ASD patients and model mice. A subpopulation of PV+ neurons expresses perineuronal nets (PNN). To better understand whether the relationship between PV and PNN is altered in ASD, we measured quantitatively the intensities of PV and PNN in single PV+ neurons in the prelimbic prefrontal cortex (PrL-PFC) of a valproic acid (VPA) model of ASD at different ages. We found a decreased PV intensity but increased PNN intensity in VPA mice. The relationship between PV and PNN intensities is altered in VPA mice, likely due to an abnormal subpopulation of neurons with an altered PV-PNN relationship. Furthermore, reducing PNN level using in vivo injection of chondroitinase ABC corrects the PV expression in adult VPA mice. We suggest that the interaction between PV and PNN is disrupted in PV+ neurons in VPA mice which may contribute to the pathology in ASD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据