4.5 Review

Recent Progress in Graphene-Based Microsupercapacitors

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202000844

关键词

composite electrodes; energy storage; fabrication techniques; graphene; microsupercapacitors

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi [01(2810)14/EMR-II]
  2. UGC-BSR-Mid Career Award [F.19-214/2018/BSR]
  3. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51873083]
  4. Postgraduate Research AMP
  5. Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX18_0759, SJCX19_0584]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent advances in graphene-based microsupercapacitors, emphasizing various fabrication technologies and performance of different composite materials.
The fast growing field of microsized electronic devices has urgent demand for next-generation microscale, flexible, and lightweight energy conversion and storage devices. Among the various microdevices, microsupercapacitors (MSCs) are a promising energy storage device due to their fast rechargeability, better rate capability, long cycle life, and ultrahigh power density. The 2D graphene possesses a large surface area with flexibility, better conductivity, transparency, and high quantum capacitance that lead to an ideal energy storage material for the MSCs. Therefore, this review aims to summarize recent advances in graphene-based MSCs. A particular emphasis is put on the various fabrication technologies for MSCs such as printing, laser, wet-spin, and photolithography technique that are discussed elaborately. Moreover, an overview of the state-of-the-art on graphene-based electrode materials and its different composite with transition metal oxides, transition metal hydroxides, conducting polymers, transition metal chalcogenides, and MXene-based electrode materials for MSCs are discussed and their electrochemical performances are summarized. Furthermore, this review concludes with perspectives and outlooks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据