4.5 Review

A Review on Thermal Properties Improvement of Phase Change Materials and Its Combination with Solar Thermal Energy Storage

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100169

关键词

additives; microcapsules; phase change materials; solar energy; thermal energy storage devices

资金

  1. Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [19DZ1203102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article summarizes measures to enhance solar phase change thermal energy storage (TES) by focusing on solar phase change materials (PCM) and solar phase transition devices. It introduces different types of PCM and their advantages and disadvantages, reviews research progress to improve thermal performance, and summarizes characteristics of commonly used solar phase transition TES devices. The aim is to provide methods and ideas for system design and research and increase overall heat transfer properties.
This article summarizes measures to enhance the solar phase change thermal energy storage (TES), starting from two key points in solar phase change TES research: solar phase change materials (PCM) and solar phase transition devices. First, different types of PCM and their advantages and disadvantages are introduced. To improve thermal performance, the research progress of different dimensional thermal conductivity additives, photothermal composite phase change materials (CPCM), and phase change microcapsules is reviewed. Then, the characteristics of commonly used solar phase transition TES devices and the research status of solar energy device improvement with fins and multistage phase transition TES are summarized for the past few years. It is hoped to provide methods and ideas for the design and research of solar phase change TES systems, and to increase the overall heat transfer properties through the combination of multiple optimization methods. Finally, the future direction and research focus of solar phase change TES technology are put forward.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据