4.3 Article

Visualization of X chromosome reactivation in mouse primordial germ cells in vivo

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.058602

关键词

X chromosome reactivation (XCR); X chromosome inactivation (XCI); Primordial germ cell (PGC); Momiji system; Reprogramming; Imaging

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [18H04892, 19H05279, 20H03443]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H05279, 18H04892, 20H03443] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X chromosome reactivation (XCR) progresses along with the proliferation and clustering of primordial germ cells (PGCs) within the genital ridge, with epigenetic memory erasure timing varying according to the locus of X-linked genes.
X chromosome inactivation (XCI), determined during development, remains stable after embryonic cell divisions. However, primordial germ cells (PGCs) are exceptions in that XCI is reprogrammed and inactivated X chromosomes are reactivated. Although interactions between PGCs and somatic cells are thought to be important for PGC development, little is known about them. Here, we performed imaging of X chromosome reactivation (XCR) using the 'Momiji' mouse system, which canmonitor the X chromosome's inactive and active states using two color fluorescence reporter genes, and investigated whether interactions would affect XCR in PGCs. Based on their expression levels, we found that XCR of the Pgk1 locus began at embryonic day (E)10.5 and was almost complete by E13.5. During this period, PGCs became distributed uniformly in the genital ridge, proliferated, and formed clusters; XCR progressed accordingly. In addition, XCR of the Pgk1 locus preceded that of the Hprt locus, indicating that the timing of epigenetic memory erasure varied according to the locus of each of these X-linked genes. Our results indicate that XCR proceeds along with the proliferation of PGCs clustered within the genital ridge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据