4.5 Article

Wrapping and Blocking of Influenza A Viruses by Sialylated 2D Nanoplatforms

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202100285

关键词

2D materials; graphene; influenza A virus; sialic acid; wrapping

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [SFB 765]
  2. Core Facility BioSupraMol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that optimal deployment of sialic acid targeting ligands on a flexible 2D platform allows for binding and wrapping of influenza A virus (IAV) particles. Different degrees of sialic acid functionalized 2D platforms were compared for their binding potential, with higher levels of functionalization showing increased binding potential for IAV.
Inhibition of respiratory viruses is one of the most urgent topics as underlined by different pandemics in the last two decades. This impels the development of new materials for binding and incapacitation of the viruses. In this work, we have demonstrated that an optimal deployment of influenza A virus (IAV) targeting ligand sialic acid (SA) on a flexible 2D platform enables its binding and wrapping around IAV particles. A series of 2D sialylated platforms consisting graphene and polyglycerol are prepared with different degrees of SA functionalization around 10%, 30%, and 90% named as G-PG-SA(L), G-PG-SA(M), and G-PG-SA(H,) respectively. The cryo-electron tomography (Cryo-ET) analysis has proved wrapping of IAV particles by G-PG-SA(M). A confocal-based colocalization assay established for these materials has offered the comparison of binding potential of sialylated and non-sialylated nanoplatforms for IAV. With this method, we have estimated the binding potential of the G-PG-SA(M) and G-PG-SA(H) sheets for IAV particles around 50 and 20 times higher than the control sheets, respectively, whereas the low functionalized G-PG-SA(L) have not shown any significant colocalization value. Moreover, optimized G-PG-SA(M) exhibits high potency to block IAV from binding with the MDCK cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据