4.5 Article

Morphometric Evaluation of Detailed Asymmetry for the Proximal Humerus in Korean Population

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13050862

关键词

proximal humerus fracture; asymmetry; computer-assisted orthopedic surgery; patient-specific Instruments; 3D bone model

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2020R1A6A3A13075521]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although proximal humerus fractures account for a small percentage of all fractures, the bilateral differences of the proximal humerus are significant, with males showing more differences than females. Using contralateral data as a template for repairing an affected proximal humerus may still be possible.
Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery and patient-specific instruments are widely used in orthopedic fields that utilize contralateral side bone data as a template to restore the affected side bone. The essential precondition for these techniques is that the left and right bone features are similar. Although proximal humerus fracture accounts for 4% to 8% of all fractures, the bilateral asymmetry of the proximal humerus is not fully understood. The aim of this study is to investigate anthropometric differences of the bilateral proximal humerus. One hundred one pairs of Korean humerus CT data from 51 females and 50 males were selected for this research. To investigate bilateral shape differences, we divided the proximal humerus into three regions and the proximal humerus further into five sections in each region. The distance from the centroid to the cortical outline at every 10 degrees was measured in each section. Differences were detected in all regions of the left and right proximal humerus; however, males had a larger number of significant differences than females. Large bilateral differences were measured in the greater tubercle. Nevertheless, using contralateral data as a template for repairing an affected proximal humerus might be possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据