4.5 Article

Enhancing Ant-Based Algorithms for Medical Image Edge Detection by Admissible Perturbations of Demicontractive Mappings

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13050885

关键词

enriched demicontractive operator; edge detection; admissible perturbation; ant-based algorithm; test function; symmetric medical image; asymmetric medical image

资金

  1. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, North University Centre at Baia Mare
  2. Technical University of Cluj-Napoca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analytically and empirically demonstrates how ant-based algorithms for medical image edge detection can be enhanced by using an admissible perturbation of demicontractive operators. The study shows that incorporating admissible perturbations of demicontractive mappings as test functions in the algorithms significantly improves the accuracy and performance of edge detection in medical images, as validated by numerical tests and empirical evaluations.
The aim of this paper is to show analytically and empirically how ant-based algorithms for medical image edge detection can be enhanced by using an admissible perturbation of demicontractive operators. We thus complement the results reported in a recent paper by the second author and her collaborators, where they used admissible perturbations of demicontractive mappings as test functions. To illustrate this fact, we first consider some typical properties of demicontractive mappings and of their admissible perturbations and then present some appropriate numerical tests to illustrate the improvement brought by the admissible perturbations of demicontractive mappings when they are taken as test functions in ant-based algorithms for medical image edge detection. The edge detection process reported in our study considers both symmetric (Head CT and Brain CT) and asymmetric (Hand X-ray) medical images. The performance of the algorithm was tested visually with various images and empirically with evaluation of parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据