4.6 Article

Technical and Environmental Comparison among Different Municipal Solid Waste Management Scenarios

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13063167

关键词

municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal; thermal treatment; landfill; environmental aspects; economic aspects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared technical, economic, and environmental aspects of different waste management scenarios, focusing on thermal treatment solutions. Results showed advantages for thermal treatment solutions and proposed a comparison methodology to help define the best waste management planning solution.
In order to determine the optimal final destination of municipal solid waste, it is necessary to consider both monetary costs and environmental externalities, as well as the local availability of waste-processing industrial infrastructure. The paper examines the results obtained from a technical, economic, and environmental comparison between different scenarios for waste management: in particular, the solutions of gasification and pyrolysis were studied and, afterwards, were compared with direct combustion in incineration plant (from the point of view of the thermal treatment) and final disposal in landfill. In order to perform this analysis, 19 plants operating on full scale were analyzed. The comparison took into account environmental, energy, and economic aspects. From the environmental and energetical point of view, the tool of mass and energy balance was used to address some key environmental aspects. In particular, some indexes were defined in order to perform a comparison among the different analyzed solutions. As concerns the economic point of view, conventional economic criteria were considered. The analysis showed advantages for the examined thermal treatment solutions. The comparison methodology that has been defined can establish a more general useful approach in order to help the definition of the best solution for waste management planning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据