4.6 Article

Safety Analysis of Young Pedestrian Behavior at Signalized Intersections: An Eye-Tracking Study

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13084419

关键词

eye-tracking; distraction; pedestrian behavior; glance behavior; reaction time; signalized crossings

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that checking social media apps at signalized intersections significantly increases pedestrians' reaction and crossing times, while decreasing crossing speeds. Additionally, pedestrians spent the majority of their time looking at their smartphones, with less interest in other street elements.
Smartphones have become an integral part of our everyday lives and keep us busy while doing other primary activities such as driving, cycling or walking in traffic. The problem of digital distraction among drivers has been largely addressed, and interest is growing also on vulnerable road users as well. In fact, high percentages of pedestrians and cyclists are accustomed to checking their devices while moving in traffic. This research links to the presented theme and aims to investigate the extent to which digital distraction in the form of social media app checking influences pedestrian behavior. The focus of the study is specifically on signalized intersections. An outdoor, eye-tracking experiment was conducted on a specific route consisting of various elements typical of urban areas. Participants were asked to walk the predefined route twice, encountering three signalized intersections: the first time they were asked to walk with their smartphone in hand, the second time without. The recordings of each participant's route were then analyzed, examining reaction time, crossing time and speed, fixations and gaze paths. The results show a clear impact of digital devices on pedestrians' attention by increasing their reaction and crossing times and decreasing crossing speeds. In addition, the analysis of fixations found that 82.54% of the time was devoted to the smartphone, while interest in other street elements decreased from 16.64% to 4.03%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据