4.6 Review

Nitrogen Fertilization. A Review of the Risks Associated with the Inefficiency of Its Use and Policy Responses

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13105625

关键词

review; nitrogen pollution; nitrogen-use efficiency; eutrophication; lixiviation; volatilization

资金

  1. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion, Spain [PID2019-107127RB-I00]
  2. Junta de Andalucia, Spain [SEJ-592]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen is a crucial input for food production, but a significant amount of nitrogen fertilizer is wasted and contributes to environmental pollution. By 2050, nitrogen pollution levels are expected to rise significantly, with agriculture playing a major role in this increase. Addressing nitrogen pollution requires collaborative efforts from policymakers, farmers, and researchers.
Nitrogen (N) is a key input to food production. Nearly half of N fertilizer input is not used by crops and is lost into the environment via emission of gases or by polluting water bodies. It is essential to achieve production levels, which enable global food security, without compromising environmental security. The N pollution level expected by 2050 is projected to be 150% higher than in 2010, with the agricultural sector accounting for 60% of this increase. In this paper, we review the status of the pollution from N fertilizers worldwide and make recommendations to address the situation. The analysis reviews the relationship between N fertilizer use, N use efficiency, no-point pollution, the role of farmer management practices, and policy approaches to address diffuse pollution caused by N fertilization. Several studies show a lack of information as one of the main hurdles to achieve changes in habits. The objective of this study is to highlight the gravity of the current global non-point pollution as well as the need for a communication effort to make farmers aware of the relationship between their activity and N pollution and, therefore, the importance of their fertilizer management practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据