4.6 Article

Pre-Positioning Facility Location and Resource Allocation in Humanitarian Relief Operations Considering Deprivation Costs

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13084141

关键词

humanitarian logistics; prepositioning strategy; facility location; deprivation cost

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71874069]
  2. Introduction and Cultivation Plan of Young Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a scenario-based stochastic program model to consider victims' welfare loss in disaster relief logistics. A case study demonstrates the importance of this model in humanitarian relief logistics.
Alleviating human sufferings during and in the aftermath of disasters is one of the most important goals in humanitarian relief logistics. The lack of relief commodities, especially life-saving items, is a life-threatening loss to victims and must be considered when making emergency supply allocation and transportation decisions, even in the pre-disaster prepositioning phase. This paper proposes a scenario-based stochastic program that integrates the decisions of prepositioning facility locations, quantities of stocked emergency supplies, and service allocations in each scenario in the same modeling framework. The estimation of victims' losses for waiting for emergency supplies is measured in the typical deprivation cost function and treated as one of the main bases of decision making, besides traditional transportation costs, in determining the service allocation strategies in each scenario. Specifically, a case study with data from the hurricane threat in the Gulf Coast area of the US was conducted to demonstrate the application of this model and the significance of considering victims' welfare loss in humanitarian relief logistics. Some interesting managerial insights were also drawn from a series of numerical experiments and sensitivity analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据