4.8 Article

Nanoporous carbon oxynitride and its enhanced lithium-ion storage performance

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105733

关键词

Mesoporous materials; Carbon nitrides; Doping; Anode materials; Li ion batteries

资金

  1. University of Newcastle Australia
  2. Australian Research Council [DE170101069]
  3. Australian Synchrotron
  4. Australian Research Council [DE170101069] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heteroatom doped nanomaterials, such as oxygen-doped carbon oxynitride, have shown promising potential as electrodes for energy storage applications. A single-step approach was used to prepare highly ordered nanoporous carbon oxynitride materials with tailored pore sizes, demonstrating improved reversible capacity and stability in lithium-ion batteries compared to non-porous carbon nitride materials.
Heteroatom doped nanomaterials are reported to be excellent electrodes for energy storage and conversion applications. However, the introduction of these heteroatoms in materials such as carbon nitride is quite challenging owing to the poor thermodynamic stability of these atoms in the carbon matrix. In this report, we demonstrate the single-step approach for the preparation of highly ordered nanoporous carbon oxynitride (OMCN) materials with tailored pore sizes by employing carbohydrazide as a single C, N, O precursor using nanotemplating approach. Experimental characterization of the O-MCN confirms oxygen doping in C-N framework. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations demonstrate that the O-MCN optimized with AB type bilayer structure can adsorb nine Li ions per unit cell with mild Li-ion binding energy value of 5.16 eV. The synthesized O-MCN materials are firstly applied in Li-ion batteries as anode materials. The optimized O-MCN displays 2.5 times higher reversible capacity than that of non-porous g-C3N4 with remarkable stability in the long run in the Li-ion battery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据