4.4 Article

New aspects of Argyres-Douglas theories and their dimensional reduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)242

关键词

Duality in Gauge Field Theories; Supersymmetric Gauge Theory; Supersymmetry and Duality

资金

  1. ERC Consolidator Grant [682608]
  2. ERC-STG [637844-HBQFTNCER]
  3. University of Milano-Bicocca grant [2016-ATESP0586]
  4. MIUR-PRIN [2017CC72MK003]
  5. INFN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper explores new aspects of AD theories in A-type class S, including the construction of conformal manifolds, structures of the Higgs branch, and features of three-dimensional gauge theories. It introduces new quiver gauge theories and proposes three-dimensional mirror theories for linear quivers associated with AD theories, providing explicit descriptions of magnetic quivers.
Argyres-Douglas (AD) theories constitute an infinite class of superconformal field theories in four dimensions with a number of interesting properties. We study several new aspects of AD theories engineered in A-type class S with one irregular puncture of Type I or Type II and also a regular puncture. These include conformal manifolds, structures of the Higgs branch, as well as the three dimensional gauge theories coming from the reduction on a circle. We find that the latter admits a description in terms of a linear quiver with unitary and special unitary gauge groups, along with a number of twisted hypermultiplets. The origin of these twisted hypermultiplets is explained from the four dimensional perspective. We also propose the three dimensional mirror theories for such linear quivers. These provide explicit descriptions of the magnetic quivers of all the AD theories in question in terms of quiver diagrams with unitary gauge groups, together with a collection of free hypermultiplets. A number of quiver gauge theories presented in this paper are new and have not been studied elsewhere in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据