4.7 Article

Neural-Based Decentralized Adaptive Finite-Time Control for Nonlinear Large-Scale Systems With Time-Varying Output Constraints

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2918351

关键词

Time-varying systems; Nonlinear systems; Adaptive systems; Large-scale systems; Stability analysis; Artificial neural networks; Lyapunov methods; Finite time; input saturation; neural network (NN); nonlinear large-scale systems; time-varying output constraints

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61703051]
  2. Department of Education of Liaoning Province [LZ2017001]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea through the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2017R1A1A1A05001325]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the adaptive finite-time decentralized control problem for time-varying output-constrained nonlinear large-scale systems preceded by input saturation. The control functions designed are approximated by neural networks, and time-varying barrier Lyapunov functions are used to ensure that the system output constraints are never breached. The proposed approach combines the backstepping approach with Lyapunov function theory, demonstrating the feasibility of the control strategy through simulation results.
This paper addresses the adaptive finite-time decentralized control problem for time-varying output-constrained nonlinear large-scale systems preceded by input saturation. The intermediate control functions designed are approximated by neural networks. Time-varying barrier Lyapunov functions are used to ensure that the system output constraints are never breached. An adaptive finite-time decentralized control scheme is devised by combining the backstepping approach with Lyapunov function theory. Under the action of the proposed approach, the system stability and desired control performance can be obtained in finite time. The feasibility of this control strategy is demonstrated by using simulation results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据