4.7 Article

Overexpression of SlGATA17 Promotes Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Tomato Plants by Enhancing Activation of the Phenylpropanoid Biosynthetic Pathway

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.634888

关键词

GATA transcription factors; tomato; drought stress; phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; overexpression

资金

  1. Breeding of New Staple Vegetable Varieties with High Quality and Disease Resistance [2019ZX16B02]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-23-A-16]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018 M630333]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Z19046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the SlGATA17 gene significantly affects the drought resistance of tomato plants under drought stress by regulating the activity of the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway.
GATA transcription factors (TFs) are widely distributed in eukaryotes. Some GATA TFs have been shown to be related to photosynthesis, germination, circadian rhythm, and other functions in plants. Our previous study found that some members of this family have obvious responses when tomato plants are subjected to drought stress, in which the SlGATA17 gene is significantly upregulated. To further verify the function of this gene under drought stress, we constructed tomato lines with this gene overexpressed. Phenotypic and physiological indicators indicated that the SlGATA17-overexpressing plants were more drought tolerant than the wild-type plants. Transcriptomic sequencing results showed that the overexpression of the SlGATA17 gene improved the activity of the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway. The PAL enzyme activity assay results confirmed that the initial activity of this pathway was enhanced in transgenic plants, especially in the initial response stage, indicating that the SlGATA17 gene regulates the drought resistance of tomato plants by regulating the activity of the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据