4.7 Article

Evaluation of Loopamp™ Leishmania Detection Kit and Leishmania Antigen ELISA for Post-Elimination Detection and Management of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Bangladesh

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.670759

关键词

visceral leishmaniasis; diagnosis; LAMP; qPCR; urine ELISA; elimination; diagnostics for VL post-elimination era

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (KfW grant) [202060457]
  2. Wellcome Trust Seed funding [108080/Z/15/Z]
  3. MRC-DTP [MR/N013514/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [108080/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the diagnostic efficacies of different sampling techniques using Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and Leishmania antigen ELISA for post-elimination visceral leishmaniasis (VL) control strategies. The Loopamp and Leishmania antigen ELISA were found to be promising tools for VL diagnostics and surveillance activities post-elimination, showing efficacy and sustainability in clinical cure at day 180.
With reduced prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in the Indian subcontinent (ISC), direct and field deployable diagnostic tests are needed to implement an effective diagnostic and surveillance algorithm for post-elimination VL control. In this regard, here we investigated the diagnostic efficacies of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay (Loopamp (TM) Leishmania Detection Kit, Eiken Chemical CO., Ltd, Japan), a real-time quantitative PCR assay (qPCR) and the Leishmania antigen ELISA (CLIN-TECH, UK) with different sampling techniques and evaluated their prospect to incorporate into post-elimination VL control strategies. Eighty clinically and rK39 rapid diagnostic test confirmed VL cases and 80 endemic healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Peripheral blood and dried blood spots (DBS) were collected from all the participants at the time of diagnosis. DNA was extracted from whole blood (WB) and DBS via silica columns (QIAGEN) and boil & spin (B&S) methods and tested with qPCR and Loopamp. Urine was collected from all participants at the time of diagnosis and was directly subjected to the Leishmania antigen ELISA. 41 patients were followed up and urine samples were collected at day 30 and day 180 after treatment and ELISA was performed. The sensitivities of the Loopamp-WB(B&S) and Loopamp-WB(QIA) were 96.2% (95% CI 89 center dot 43-99 center dot 22) and 95% (95% CI 87 center dot 69-98 center dot 62) respectively. The sensitivity of Loopamp-DBS(QIA) was 85% (95% CI 75 center dot 26- 92 center dot 00). The sensitivities of the qPCR-WB(QIA) and qPCR-DBS(QIA) were 93.8% (95% CI 86 center dot 01-97 center dot 94) and 72.5% (95% CI 61 center dot 38-81 center dot 90) respectively. The specificity of all molecular assays was 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Leishmania antigen ELISA were 97.5% (95% CI 91 center dot 47-99 center dot 70) and 91.95% (95% CI 84 center dot 12-96 center dot 70) respectively. The Leishmania antigen ELISA depicted clinical cure at day 180 in all the followed-up cases. Efficacy and sustainability identify the Loopamp-WB(B&S) and the Leishmania antigen ELISA as promising and minimally invasive VL diagnostic tools to support VL diagnostic and surveillance activities respectively in the post-elimination era.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据