4.7 Article

Implication of the Type IV Secretion System in the Pathogenicity of Vibrio tapetis, the Etiological Agent of Brown Ring Disease Affecting the Manila Clam Ruditapes philippinarum

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.634427

关键词

Brown Ring Disease; Vibrio tapetis; Ruditapes philippinarum; hemocytes; type four secretion system; rounding phenotype; colonization; mutagenesis

资金

  1. H2020 European project VIVALDI [678589]
  2. University of Western Brittany (UBO)
  3. investment for the future program LabexMER [ANR-10-LABX-19]
  4. investment for the future program ISblue [ANR-17-EURE-0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated the importance of the T4SS of V. tapetis in the development of Brown Ring Disease in the Manila clam. While the T4SS was not responsible for the decrease of lysosomal activity during BRD, it did play a role in reducing the prevalence and mortality dynamics of the disease.
Vibrio tapetis is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes infections of mollusk bivalves and fish. The Brown Ring Disease (BRD) is an infection caused by V. tapetis that primarily affects the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum. Recent studies have shown that a type IV secretion system (T4SS) gene cluster is exclusively found in strains of V. tapetis pathogenic to clams. However, whether the T4SS is implicated or not during the infection process remains unknown. The aim of this study was to create and characterize a V. tapetis T4SS null mutant, obtained by a near-complete deletion of the virB4 gene, in order to determine the role of T4SS in the development of BRD. This study demonstrated that the T4SS is neither responsible for the loss of hemocyte adhesion capacities, nor for the decrease of the lysosomal activity during BRD. Nevertheless, we observed a 50% decrease of the BRD prevalence and a decrease of mortality dynamics with the Delta virB4 mutant. This work demonstrates that the T4SS of V. tapetis plays an important role in the development of BRD in the Manila clam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据