4.8 Article

Molecular tracking devices quantify antigen distribution and archiving in the murine lymph node

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.62781

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI121209, T32 AI007405, R35 GM119550, T32 AI074491, R21 AI155929]
  2. University of Colorado Denver
  3. American Cancer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional techniques for detecting foreign antigens in vivo have limitations, prompting the development of a "molecular tracking device" to better study the distribution and retention of antigens in lymph nodes. By utilizing an antigen conjugated to a nuclease-resistant DNA tag and single-cell mRNA sequencing, antigen abundance in lymph nodes can be quantified. This advancement enables new approaches to study the dissemination of antigen-adjuvant conjugates and to identify mechanisms of antigen acquisition and retention at a cellular level in vivo.
The detection of foreign antigens in vivo has relied on fluorescent conjugation or indirect read-outs such as antigen presentation. In our studies, we found that these widely used techniques had several technical limitations that have precluded a complete picture of antigen trafficking or retention across lymph node cell types. To address these limitations, we developed a 'molecular tracking device' to follow the distribution, acquisition, and retention of antigen in the lymph node. Utilizing an antigen conjugated to a nuclease-resistant DNA tag, acting as a combined antigen-adjuvant conjugate, and single-cell mRNA sequencing, we quantified antigen abundance in the lymph node. Variable antigen levels enabled the identification of caveolar endocytosis as a mechanism of antigen acquisition or retention in lymphatic endothelial cells. Thus, these molecular tracking devices enable new approaches to study dynamic tissue dissemination of antigen-adjuvant conjugates and identify new mechanisms of antigen acquisition and retention at cellular resolution in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据