4.8 Article

Robust, coherent, and synchronized circadian clock-controlled oscillations along Anabaena filaments

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.64348

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Plan Nacional de Investigacion, Spain [BFU201788202-P, BUF2016-77097-P]
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. Fondazione Ente Cassa di Risparmio, Florence, Italy
  4. Project EXPLICS by Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation
  5. Minerva Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on the circadian clock in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 cells reveals significant synchronization and spatial coherence, as well as features such as regulated gene expression, cell-cell communication, and cell cycle control. Additionally, the transcriptional oscillations of key genes suggest a multi-level regulation system.
Circadian clocks display remarkable reliability despite significant stochasticity in biomolecular reactions. We study the dynamics of a circadian clock-controlled gene at the individual cell level in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, a multicellular filamentous cyanobacterium. We found significant synchronization and spatial coherence along filaments, clock coupling due to cell-cell communication, and gating of the cell cycle. Furthermore, we observed low-amplitude circadian oscillatory transcription of kai genes encoding the post-transcriptional core oscillatory circuit and high-amplitude oscillations of rpaA coding for the master regulator transducing the core clock output. Transcriptional oscillations of rpaA suggest an additional level of regulation. A stochastic one-dimensional toy model of coupled clock cores and their phosphorylation states shows that demographic noise can seed stochastic oscillations outside the region where deterministic limit cycles with circadian periods occur. The model reproduces the observed spatio-temporal coherence along filaments and provides a robust description of coupled circadian clocks in a multicellular organism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据