4.7 Article

Health care transitions for persons living with dementia and their caregivers

期刊

BMC GERIATRICS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02235-5

关键词

Dementia; Health care system navigation; Health care transitions; Care coordination; Constructivist grounded theory

资金

  1. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  2. University of Waterloo President's Scholarship
  3. St. Joseph's Healthcare London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a theoretical framework to better understand the care transition experiences of persons living with dementia and their caregivers in Ontario, Canada. The framework outlines the context, processes, and influencing factors of care transitions, providing a focal point for efforts to improve the healthcare transitions of persons with dementia.
Background Persons with dementia are likely to require care from various health care providers in multiple care settings, necessitating navigation through an often-fragmented care system. This study aimed to create a better understanding of care transition experiences from the perspectives of persons living with dementia and their caregivers in Ontario, Canada, through the development of a theoretical framework. Methods Constructivist grounded theory guided the study. Seventeen individual caregiver interviews, and 12 dyad interviews including persons with dementia and their caregivers, were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were coded using NVivo 10 software; analysis occurred iteratively until saturation was reached. Results A theoretical framework outlining the context, processes, and influencing factors of care transitions was developed and refined. Gaining an in-depth understanding of the complex care transitions of individuals with dementia and their caregivers is an important step in improving the quality of care and life for this population. Conclusion The framework developed in this study provides a focal point for efforts to improve the health care transitions of persons living with dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据