4.5 Article

The use of vertebral measurements for body length and weight reconstruction of pike (Esox lucius) from archaeological sites

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-021-01325-0

关键词

Esox lucius; Vertebrae; Size reconstruction; Regression; Archaeozoology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides regression equations for estimating the body length and weight of pike based on measurements of vertebrae. The analysis shows that only length measurements can be used for estimating body length. Additionally, a case study demonstrates the potential of the new osteometrical data.
Pike (Esox lucius) is a large freshwater species with a wide distribution in Eurasia and North America that has been exploited since prehistoric times as is shown by the skeletal remains found on numerous archaeological sites. The role the species played in the subsistence of inland human settlements can be documented by its proportion within the spectrum of exploited fish and by reconstructing the body lengths of the pike and the amount of meat they represent. Osteometrical data in the literature allow size and, sometimes, meat weight reconstructions on the basis of the measurements of isolated cranial bones, but little attention has been paid thus far to the use of vertebrae for such reconstructions. Using a series of 27 dry skeletons of modern pike, here, we provide regression equations that allow an accurate estimation of the body length and weight of the fish on the basis of each of the first five vertebrae. Analysis of the size variation of the height, width and length of all the vertebral centra along the vertebral column, through the construction of the so-called Global Rachidian Profile, showed that only the length measurements can be of potential use for a rather crude estimation of body length. Finally, a case study is provided, using a large assemblage of Early Neolithic pike vertebrae, to show the potential of the new osteometrical data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据