4.6 Article

An Enhanced Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization in Water Distribution Systems Design

期刊

WATER
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13101334

关键词

multi-objective algorithms; network resilience; particle swarm optimization; water distribution systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed a new hybrid fast-convergent multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm to optimize water distribution system designs in the face of water scarcity. The algorithm performs well in medium-sized networks and even better in large networks without the use of local search.
The scarcity of water resources nowadays lays stress on researchers to develop strategies aiming at making the best benefit of the currently available resources. One of these strategies is ensuring that reliable and near-optimum designs of water distribution systems (WDSs) are achieved. Designing WDSs is a discrete combinatorial NP-hard optimization problem, and its complexity increases when more objectives are added. Among the many existing evolutionary algorithms, a new hybrid fast-convergent multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is developed to increase the convergence and diversity rates of the resulted non-dominated solutions in terms of network capital cost and reliability using a minimized computational budget. Several strategies are introduced to the developed algorithm, which are self-adaptive PSO parameters, regeneration-on-collision, adaptive population size, and using hypervolume quality for selecting repository members. A local search method is also coupled to both the original MOPSO algorithm and the newly developed one. Both algorithms are applied to medium and large benchmark problems. The results of the new algorithm coupled with the local search are superior to that of the original algorithm in terms of different performance metrics in the medium-sized network. In contrast, the new algorithm without the local search performed better in the large network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据