4.7 Review

Quantitative Modeling of Climate Change Impacts on Mycotoxins in Cereals: A Review

期刊

TOXINS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13040276

关键词

deoxynivalenol; fusarium toxins; aflatoxins; adaptation; food safety; food safety management; wheat; maize; rice

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, the Netherlands [KB-34-003-1C, KB-34]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change affects mycotoxin formation in cereal grains both directly and indirectly, with models showing an increase in mycotoxins in a changing climate. However, most models do not provide adaptation strategies for dealing with climate change impacts.
Our climate is projected to change gradually over time. Mycotoxin occurrence in cereal grains is both directly and indirectly related to local weather and to climate changes. Direct routes are via the effects of precipitation, relative humidity, and temperatures on both fungal infection of the grain and mycotoxin formation. Indirect routes are via the effects of the wind dispersal of spores, insect attacks, and shifts in cereal grain phenology. This review aimed to investigate available modeling studies for climate change impacts on mycotoxins in cereal grains, and to identify how they can be used to safeguard food safety with future climate change. Using a systematic review approach, in total, 53 relevant papers from the period of 2005-2020 were retrieved. Only six of them focused on quantitative modeling of climate change impacts on mycotoxins, all in pre-harvest cereal grains. Although regional differences exist, the model results generally show an increase in mycotoxins in a changing climate. The models do not give an indication on how to adapt to climate change impacts. If available models were linked with land use and crop models, scenario analyses could be used for analyzing adaptation strategies to avoid high mycotoxin presence in cereal grains and to safeguard the safety of our feed and food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据