4.7 Article

Reduction of Ochratoxin A during the Preparation of Porridge with Sodium Bicarbonate and Fructose

期刊

TOXINS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13030224

关键词

Ochratoxin A (OTA); indirect steaming; sodium bicarbonate; fructose

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant [2016-67017-24418]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  3. International Youth Exchange Foundation of the Henan Academy of Agricultural Science (HAAS) fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the reduction of OTA during the preparation of rice- and oat-based porridge can be effectively achieved through a simulated indirect steam process, especially when sodium bicarbonate and/or fructose are added.
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a potential human carcinogen that poses a significant concern in food safety and public health. OTA has been found in a wide variety of agricultural commodities, including cereal grains. This study investigated the reduction of OTA during the preparation of rice- and oat-based porridge by a simulated indirect steam process. The effects of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and fructose on the reduction of OTA were also investigated. During the processing, OTA in rice- and oat-porridge was decreased by 59% and 14%, respectively, from initial OTA artificially added at 20 mu g/kg (dry weight basis). When 0.5% and 1% of sodium bicarbonate were added to rice porridge, increased reduction of OTA was observed as 78% and 68%, respectively. The same amounts of added sodium bicarbonate also further reduced OTA in oat porridge to 58% and 72%, respectively. In addition, increased reduction of OTA in the presence of fructose was observed. A combination of the two, i.e., 0.5% sodium bicarbonate and 0.5% fructose, resulted in a 79% and 67% reduction in rice porridge and oat porridge, respectively. These results indicate that indirect steaming may effectively reduce OTA in preparation of porridge-type products, particularly when sodium bicarbonate and/or fructose are added.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据