4.7 Article

Ochratoxin A Induces Oxidative Stress in HepG2 Cells by Impairing the Gene Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes

期刊

TOXINS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13040271

关键词

ochratoxin A (OTA); hepatotoxicity; HepG2; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species (ROS)

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant [2011-67005-20676]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  3. CONACYT-Mexico [CVU 335085]
  4. Chung-Ang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin found in foods that can cause oxidative stress, leading to cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells, including an increase in ROS and a depletion of GSH. Additionally, OTA downregulates the mRNA level of catalase (CAT) and decreases CAT enzymatic activity in a dose-dependent manner.
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin frequently found in raw and processed foods. While it is considered a possible human carcinogen, the mechanism of action remains unclear. OTA has been shown to be hepatotoxic in both in vitro and in vivo models and oxidative stress may be one of the factors contributing to its toxicity. Hence, the effect of OTA on human hepatocellular carcinoma, HepG2 cells, was investigated on oxidative stress parameters. The cytotoxicity of OTA on HepG2 was time- and dose-dependent within a range between 0.1 and 10 mu M; while 100 mu M of OTA increased the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, the levels of glutathione (GSH) were increased by 9.7% and 11.3% at 10 and 100 nM of OTA, respectively; while OTA at 100 mu M depleted GSH by 40.5% after 24 h exposure compared with the control. Finally, the mRNA level of catalase (CAT) was downregulated by 2.33-, 1.92-, and 1.82-fold after cells were treated with 1, 10, and 10 mu M OTA for 24 h, respectively; which was linked to a decrease in CAT enzymatic activity. These results suggest that oxidative stress is involved in OTA-mediated toxicity in HepG2 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据