4.7 Article

A Disparity Refinement Algorithm for Satellite Remote Sensing Images Based on Mean-Shift Plane Segmentation

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13101903

关键词

disparity refinement; three-dimensional reconstruction; remote sensing image

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51679058]
  2. Shandong Natural Science Foundation in China [2020-2022, ZR2019LZH005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for disparity refinement based on plane segmentation was proposed in this study, which accurately fits planes in the presence of noise and approximates surfaces through plane combination.
Objects in satellite remote sensing image sequences often have large deformations, and the stereo matching of this kind of image is so difficult that the matching rate generally drops. A disparity refinement method is needed to correct and fill the disparity. A method for disparity refinement based on the results of plane segmentation is proposed in this paper. The plane segmentation algorithm includes two steps: Initial segmentation based on mean-shift and alpha-expansion-based energy minimization. According to the results of plane segmentation and fitting, the disparity is refined by filling missed matching regions and removing outliers. The experimental results showed that the proposed plane segmentation method could not only accurately fit the plane in the presence of noise but also approximate the surface by plane combination. After the proposed plane segmentation method was applied to the disparity refinement of remote sensing images, many missed matches were filled, and the elevation errors were reduced. This proved that the proposed algorithm was effective. For difficult evaluations resulting from significant variations in remote sensing images of different satellites, the edge matching rate and the edge matching map are proposed as new stereo matching evaluation and analysis tools. Experiment results showed that they were easy to use, intuitive, and effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据