4.7 Article

Profiling Dust Mass Concentration in Northwest China Using a Joint Lidar and Sun-Photometer Setting

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13061099

关键词

dust mass concentration; mass extinction efficiency; identification and separation of dust aerosol; lidar-photometer method; Northwest China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41775022, 41521004]
  2. Strategic PriorityResearch ProgramofChineseAcademy of Sciences [XDA2006010 301]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2020-kb02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite-based estimation of dust mass concentration (DMC) is crucial for global biogeochemical cycle assessment of dust aerosols. A classic lidar-photometer method effectively identifies and separates dust from pollutants, revealing a negative correlation between dust mass extinction efficiency (MEE) and particle size. Results suggest that considering the variation of MEE with dust particle size is important in accurately estimating DMC.
The satellite-based estimation of the dust mass concentration (DMC) is essential for accurately evaluating the global biogeochemical cycle of the dust aerosols. As for the uncertainties in estimating DMC caused by mixing dust and pollutants and assuming a fixed value for the mass extinction efficiency (MEE), a classic lidar-photometer method is employed to identify and separate the dust from pollutants, obtain the dust MEE, and evaluate the effect of the above uncertainties, during five dust field experiments in Northwest China. Our results show that this method is effective for continental aerosol mixtures consisting of dust and pollutants. It is also seen that the dust loading mainly occurred in the free troposphere (<6 km), with the average mass loading of 905 +/- 635 mu g m(-2) trapped in the planetary boundary layer. The dust MEE ranges from 0.30 to 0.60 m(2) g(-1) and has a significantly negative relationship with the size of dust particles. With the assumption of the dust MEE of 0.37 (0.60) m(2) g(-1), the DMC is shown to be overestimated (underestimated) by 20-40% (15-30%). In other words, our results suggest that the change of MEE with the size of dust particles should be considered in the estimation of DMC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据