4.7 Article

Theoretical Characterization of New Frustrated Lewis Pairs for Responsive Materials

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13101573

关键词

self-healing polymers; dynamic bonds; reversible chemistry; frustrated Lewis pairs; triphenylborane derivatives; triphenylphosphine derivatives

资金

  1. Eusko Jaurlaritza grant [IT1254-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, responsive materials and dynamic bonds have been widely acclaimed and applied in the research of advanced materials. The new materials, frustrated Lewis pairs (FLP), have been used to create responsive materials and a new material proposal based on FLP-DEAD complexes has been put forward.
In recent years, responsive materials including dynamic bonds have been widely acclaimed due to their expectation to pilot advanced materials. Within these materials, synthetic polymers have shown to be good candidates. Recently, the so-called frustrated Lewis pairs (FLP) have been used to create responsive materials. Concretely, the activation of diethyl azodicarboxylate (DEAD) by a triphenylborane (TPB) and triphenylphosphine (TPP) based FLP has been recently exploited for the production of dynamic cross-links. In this work, we computationally explore the underlying dynamic chemistry in these materials, in order to understand the nature and reversibility of the interaction between the FLP and DEAD. With this goal in mind, we first characterize the acidity and basicity of several TPB and TPP derivatives using different substituents, such as electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups. Our results show that strong electron-donating groups increase the acidity of TPB and decrease the basicity of TPP. However, the FLP-DEAD interaction is not mainly dominated by the influence of these substituents in the acidity or basicity of the TPB or TPP systems, but by attractive or repulsive forces between substituents such as hydrogen bonds or steric effects. Based on these results, a new material is proposed based on FLP-DEAD complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据