4.7 Review

Textile Chemical Sensors Based on Conductive Polymers for the Analysis of Sweat

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13060894

关键词

conductive polymers; wearable sensors; textile sensors; fiber electronics; sweat analysis; potentiometric sensors; organic electrochemical transistor

资金

  1. National Operation Program (PON) of the Ministry of Education, University and Research (Project PON-MIUR 2018 (Italy)) [ARS01_00996]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wearable textile chemical sensors have great potential in various fields such as medicine and sports, with conductive polymers playing a key role in adapting to flexible substrates. Sweat analysis is particularly attractive for wearable technologies, offering non-invasive and continuous monitoring capabilities. Conductive polymers are promising candidates for interfacing with the human body and overcoming challenges in real-time sweat monitoring.
Wearable textile chemical sensors are promising devices due to the potential applications in medicine, sports activities and occupational safety and health. Reaching the maturity required for commercialization is a technology challenge that mainly involves material science because these sensors should be adapted to flexible and light-weight substrates to preserve the comfort of the wearer. Conductive polymers (CPs) are a fascinating solution to meet this demand, as they exhibit the mechanical properties of polymers, with an electrical conductivity typical of semiconductors. Moreover, their biocompatibility makes them promising candidates for effectively interfacing the human body. In particular, sweat analysis is very attractive to wearable technologies as perspiration is a naturally occurring process and sweat can be sampled non-invasively and continuously over time. This review discusses the role of CPs in the development of textile electrochemical sensors specifically designed for real-time sweat monitoring and the main challenges related to this topic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据