4.7 Article

Improving Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Various Virgin and Recycled Polypropylenes by Blending with Long-Chain Branched Polypropylene

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13071137

关键词

reactive extrusion; long-chain branching; recycled polypropylene; blends; upcycling; rheology; mechanical properties

资金

  1. FFG, Recycling Healing of polyOlefins (RHO) [867903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blending LCB-PP and L-PP can increase the molecular weight and distribution of the polymer, improve melt strength, and enhance mechanical properties. Especially when using recycled polypropylene, this method demonstrates the potential for upcycling.
Blends of two long-chain branched polypropylenes (LCB-PP) and five linear polypropylenes (L-PP) were prepared in a single screw extruder at 240 degrees C. The two LCB-PPs were self-created via reactive extrusion at 180 degrees C by using dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate (PODIC C126) and dilauroyl peroxide (LP) as peroxides. For blending two virgin and three recycled PPs like coffee caps, yoghurt cups and buckets with different melt flow rate (MFR) values were used. The influence of using blends was assessed by investigating the rheological (dynamic and extensional rheology) and mechanical properties (tensile test and impact tensile test). The dynamic rheology indicated that the molecular weight as well as the molecular weight distribution could be increased or broadened. Also the melt strength behavior could be improved by using the two peroxide modified LCB-PP blends on the basis of PODIC C126 or PEROXAN LP (dilauroyl peroxide). In addition, the mechanical properties were consistently enhanced or at least kept constant compared to the original material. In particular, the impact tensile strength but also the elongation at break could be increased considerably. This study showed that the blending of LCB-PP can increase the investigated properties and represents a promising option, especially when using recycled PP, which demonstrates a real up-cycling process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据