4.7 Article

Effect of the Process Parameters on the Adhesive Strength of Dissimilar Polymers Obtained by Multicomponent Injection Molding

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13071039

关键词

wood composites; plastics; lap shear; hybrid joints

资金

  1. SENAI CIMATEC, Federal University of Bahia, via the graduate program in industrial engineering
  2. Brazilian National Research Council, CNPq [300938/2012-8, 471546/2012-7, 304705/2015-2, 404004/2016-4, 305331/2018-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that increasing the overlap area significantly increased adhesive strength, and temperature and injection flow rate were the key factors in strengthening the bonds of dissimilar materials.
The growing demand in the consumer market for products with sustainable technologies has motivated new applications using overmolded natural fiber composites. Therefore, studies have been conducted mainly to understand the adhesive properties of overmolded parts. In the present study, a polypropylene (PP) composite with 30% coconut fibers without additives was developed with the aid of a corotating twin screw extruder. Subsequently, a multicomponent injection mold was developed based on the geometry of the ISO 527 type I specimen, in which samples overmolded with PP and PP-coconut-fiber composite, with the overlap in the central area, were obtained to evaluate the adhesive strength of dissimilar materials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bond between PP and PP-coconut-fiber composite under different processing conditions using an adhesive strength testing device to perform a pure shear analysis. The experimental conditions followed a statistical design considering four factors in two levels and a significance level of 5%. The results indicated that adhesive strength increased significantly as the overlap area increased. It was observed that temperature and injection flow rate were the factors that most contributed to strengthening the bonds of dissimilar materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据