4.0 Article

Blood Lead Declines in Wintering American Black Ducks in New Jersey Following the Lead Shot Ban

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 174-182

出版社

U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
DOI: 10.3996/JFWM-20-044

关键词

American black duck; Anas rubripes; blood lead level; lead ammunition; lead poisoning; New Jersey; nontoxic shot; waterfowl

资金

  1. Wildlife and Sportfish Restoration Funds [FW-69-R, W68-R]
  2. New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Hunter
  3. Angler Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that blood lead levels in black ducks have decreased after the ban on lead shot, but evidence of lead exposure still exists in 2017, indicating a need for further research.
Waterfowl managers first recognized the problem of lead poisoning in ducks from the ingestion of spent lead shot (pellets) over 100 years ago. The phaseout of lead shot for waterfowl hunting began in the Atlantic Flyway in the 1970s. Lead shot was subsequently banned throughout the United States and Canada prior to 2000. We compared blood lead levels in American black ducks Anas rubripes wintering in coastal New Jersey in 1978, prior to the lead ban, and in 2017, about 39 years after lead shot was first banned for use in Atlantic coastal marshes and 27 years after it was banned for waterfowl hunting in New Jersey. The prevalence of blood lead >0.2 ppm, a level commonly used to indicate lead exposure, declined nearly fourfold from 1978 (79%) to 2017 (20%). We found no significant differences in the prevalence of birds with blood lead levels >0.2 ppm between sexes in either year or between age classes in 2017. The prevalence of ducks with blood lead levels >1.0 ppm, considered clinically evident toxicity, declined from 19% in 1978 to 1% in 2017. Our study provides further evidence that the ban on the use of lead shot over 20 years ago throughout North America has resulted in lower blood lead levels in waterfowl. Notwithstanding, we still found evidence of lead exposure in black ducks in 2017, which warrants further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据