4.3 Article

Improvement of Enzymatic Glucose Conversion from Chestnut Shells through Optimization of KOH Pretreatment

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073772

关键词

chestnut shells; statistical optimization; KOH pretreatment; enzymatic hydrolysis; food processing wastes

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) [NRF-2020R1C1C1005060, NRF-2020R1A2C1007493]
  2. Kwangwoon University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By pretreating chestnut shells with KOH, this study successfully increased their enzymatic digestibility and optimized reaction conditions, resulting in a significant increase in glucan content and enzymatic digestibility of untreated chestnut shells.
Worldwide, about one-third of food produced for human consumption is wasted, which includes byproducts from food processing, with a significant portion of the waste still being landfilled. The aim of this study is to convert chestnut shells (CNSs) from food processing into a valuable resource through bioprocesses. Currently, one of the highest barriers to bioprocess commercialization is low conversion of sugar from biomass, and KOH pretreatment was suggested to improve enzymatic digestibility (ED) of CNS. KOH concentration of 3% (w/w) was determined as a suitable pretreatment solution by a fundamental experiment. The reaction factors including temperature, time and solid/liquid (S/L) ratio were optimized (77.1 g/L CNS loading at 75 degrees C for 2.8 h) by response surface methodology (RSM). In the statistical model, temperature and time showed a relatively significant effect on the glucan content (GC) and ED, but S/L ratio was not. GC and ED of the untreated CNS were 45.1% and 12.7%, respectively. On the other hand, GC and ED of pretreated CNS were 83.2% and 48.4%, respectively, and which were significantly improved by about 1.8-fold and 3.8-fold compared to the control group. The improved ED through the optimization is expected to contribute to increasing the value of byproducts generated in food processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据