4.3 Article

The Effect of Social Isolation on Physical Activity during the COVID-19 Pandemic in France

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105070

关键词

lifestyles; social distancing; lockdown; sedentarity; education; covid-19

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This cross-sectional study analyzed the changes in physical activity (PA) practice among 2099 French adults during the first COVID-19 lockdown. The study found that individuals with lower education levels, housewives, retirees, and those living in mid-sized cities were more likely to continue PA practice, while individuals with lower education levels and chronic diseases were more likely to start exercising during the lockdown. The results emphasize the complexity of factors influencing PA practice during lockdowns.
The objective of this cross-sectional study is to analyze the changes in physical activity (PA) practice of a sample of 2099 French adults, mostly females, who answered an online questionnaire during the first COVID-19 lockdown (March-May 2020). A descriptive analysis of participants was performed using relative frequencies. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare the responses of selected variables. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to compare the variations of PA with all the variables identified. The age of participants ranged from 18 to 88. Among people who practiced PAs before the first lockdown, the probability to keep practicing PAs is higher among those with a lower level of education, among housewives and retirees and among those who lived in cities of 10,000-19,999 inhabitants. For those who did not practice PAs before the social distancing, the probability of starting to practice is greater in those with a lower level of education and for those who suffered from a chronic disease. Our results place the emphasis on the complexity and multifactoriality of the changes that emerged during the first lockdown. The education factor emerges, as a significant determinant of PA that should certainly be explored further.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据