4.3 Article

Evaluation of a Wearable Non-Invasive Thermometer for Monitoring Ear Canal Temperature during Physically Demanding (Outdoor) Work

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094896

关键词

thermal physiology; heat strain; overheating

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund
  2. province and municipality of Groningen
  3. province of Drenthe [T-3036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the accuracy of a wearable non-invasive thermometer and found high correlations with ear canal infrared thermometry in both laboratory and field settings. However, environmental conditions and personal protective clothing affected the accuracy of the thermometer.
Aimed at preventing heat strain, health problems, and absenteeism among workers with physically demanding occupations, a continuous, accurate, non-invasive measuring system may help such workers monitor their body (core) temperature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and explore the usability of the wearable non-invasive Cosinuss degrees degrees Temp thermometer. Ear canal temperature was monitored in 49 workers in real-life working conditions. After individual correction, the results of the laboratory and field study revealed high correlations compared to ear canal infrared thermometry for hospital use. After performance of the real-life working tasks, this correlation was found to be moderate. It was also observed that the ambient environmental outdoor conditions and personal protective clothing influenced the accuracy and resulted in unrealistic ear canal temperature outliers. It was found that the Cosinuss degrees degrees Temp thermometer did not result in significant interference during work. Therefore, it was concluded that, without a correction factor, the Cosinuss degrees degrees Temp thermometer is inaccurate. Nevertheless, with a correction factor, the reliability of this wearable ear canal thermometer was confirmed at rest, but not in outdoor working conditions or while wearing a helmet or hearing protection equipment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据