4.3 Article

Changes in Body Composition, Energy Expenditure, and Energy Intake during Four Years of University-A Follow-Up Study

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083990

关键词

weight gain; body fat percentage; physical activity; nutrition; university

资金

  1. Brock University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition to university often leads to negative lifestyle habits that result in weight and fat gain, especially during the first year. While energy expenditure increased over the university years, it was not sufficient to reverse the weight and fat gained in the initial year.
Purpose: The transition to university is often accompanied by the adoption of negative lifestyle habits, which may result in weight and fat gain. While this has been demonstrated during 1st year, little is known about subsequent years. We investigated changes in body composition, energy expenditure, and dietary/energy intake from 1st to 4th year university. Methods: Thirty-eight students (14 males, 24 females) completed a lifestyle questionnaire and had their body mass, fat mass, lean body mass (LBM), and body fat percentage (%BF) measured three times: at the beginning and end of 1st year, and end of 4th year. Results: During 1st year, body mass, fat mass, LBM, and %BF increased (+3.2 +/- 3.8 kg, +2.5 +/- 3.0 kg, +0.7 +/- 2.1 kg, +2.3 +/- 4.9%, respectively; p < 0.01), while daily energy intake and expenditure decreased (-359 +/- 1019 kcal center dot d(-1) and -434 +/- 786 kcal center dot d(-1), respectively; p < 0.01). Between the end of 1st year and end of 4th year, body mass, LBM, and energy expenditure increased (+3.2 +/- 3.8 kg, +1.3 +/- 2.9 kg, +209 +/- 703 kcal center dot d(-1), respectively; p <= 0.05), while %BF, fat mass, and energy intake did not change. Conclusions: Although %BF and fat mass remained stable from the end of 1st year to the end of 4th year in this group of university students, the positive increase in energy expenditure was not enough to reverse the weight and fat gained during 1st year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据