4.3 Article

Normative Data of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Community-Dwelling Older Japanese

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073577

关键词

physical activity; sedentary time; tri-axial accelerometer; older adult; Japanese

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K09146]
  2. Japan's Agency for Medical Research and Development [AMED 17942839]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted on 3998 community-dwelling Japanese adults aged 65 years and older to determine their levels of physical activity and sedentary time. The results showed that the subjects generally adhered to the physical activity guideline, but adherence decreased with older age. The study also found that sedentary time was high, but majority of the subjects met the current physical activity guideline by engaging in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity.
Background: The amounts of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and sedentary time (ST) by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) in older Japanese adults have not been known. We conducted this study to determine the actual physical activity (PA) and ST in this population. Subjects and Methods: A total of 3998 community-dwelling Japanese adults aged >= 65 years were investigated. Their levels of PA and ST and number of steps taken daily were assessed for seven consecutive days by a tri-axial accelerometer. Normative values of daily PA and ST were analyzed by age and BMI groups in the men and the women and are presented as mean, median, or decile. Results: The subjects generally adhered to the PA guideline, i.e., >= 10 metabolic equivalents (METs)center dot hour MVPA per week. Older age was associated with lower adherence to the PA guideline. Conclusions: Normative values (mean, median, or decile) were yielded for MVPA, LPA, and ST based on accelerometer readings in a large sample of older community-dwelling Japanese adults. One-half of the subjects' waking time was spent being sedentary, and >70% of the subjects met the current PA guideline by engaging in MVPA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据