4.6 Article

Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1399-1

关键词

Electrocoagulation; Air cathode; Arsenic; Current density; Energy consumption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42077171]
  2. Special Fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [20Y02ESPCT]
  3. Basic Foresight Project of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation [JC-2020-KF008]
  4. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST [2015QNRC001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that current density has varying effects on arsenic removal efficiency in different redox environments. In the ACEC system, current density had little impact on arsenic removal efficiency, while in other systems, higher current densities inhibited arsenic removal.
Naturally occurring arsenic enrichment in groundwater poses a huge threat to human health. Air cathode electrocoagulation (ACEC) has recently been proposed to enhance As(III) oxidation and lower energy consumption. In this study, ACEC, EC/O-2 and EC/N-2 were evaluated with different current densities from 1 to 8 mA/cm(2) to investigate the effect on As(III) removal in different redox environments. Current density had no appreciable effect on arsenic removal efficiency given the same charge in ACEC because the concentration ratio of Fe/H2O2 under different current densities remained stable. However, in EC/O-2 and EC/N-2, As(III) removal was inhibited at higher current densities (4-8 mA/cm(2)), likely because more Fe(II) competed with As(III) for the oxidant, leading to less effective oxidation of As(III). In all EC systems, the OH units generated per power consumption reached the highest value at the lowest current density. Compared with other EC systems, the ACEC system showed lower energy consumption at all current densities due to the low energy consumption of the electrode reaction and more free radical generation. A lower current density saved more energy at the expense of time, showing the trade-off relationship between energy consumption and removal time. The operation costs for As(III) removal under optimal conditions were calculated as 0.028 $/m(3) for ACEC, 0.030 $/m(3) for EC/O-2, and 0.085 $/m(3) for EC/N-2

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据