4.0 Article

Cognitive performance and lifetime cannabis use in patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder

期刊

COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHIATRY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 257-272

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2021.1924649

关键词

Schizophrenia; cognition; cannabis; substance use; psychosis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MEYS) under the NPU I. programme [LO1611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that patients with first-episode schizophrenia who had a history of cannabis use showed less impaired cognitive functioning, particularly in visual memory, compared to non-users.
Introduction: Cognitive impairment is among the core features of schizophrenia. In a healthy population, the cognitive deficit is often linked with cannabis abuse, and although the same would be expected in patients with schizophrenia, research has presented contradictory results. Methods: Participants were patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) spectrum disorder who had been lifetime cannabis users (N = 30), FES non-users (N = 53) as well as healthy controls (HC) also divided into cannabis users (N = 20) and non-users (N = 49). All participants underwent an extensive neurocognitive assessment and filled in a cannabis questionnaire, which allowed for a comparison of the four groups on cognitive functioning. Results: FES patients using cannabis showed less impaired cognitive functioning with the most prominent difference in visual memory compared to FES non-users. However, they differed neither in the clinical assessment of general psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms, nor in medication from the patient's non-users. A comparison of the HC who used cannabis, and those who did not, revealed no sizeable differences in cognitive performance between the groups. Conclusions: The results delivered supporting evidence for the trend of superior neurocognitive performance in FES patients with a lifetime history of cannabis use compared to non-using patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据