4.8 Article

Establishment of a reverse genetics system for SARS-CoV-2 using circular polymerase extension reaction

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP20wm0225002, JP20he0822006, JP20fk0108264, JP20he0822008, JP20wm0225003, JP20fk0108267, JP19fk0108113, JP20wm0125010]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) [JP19K24679]
  4. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (Moonshot RD) [JPMJMS2025]
  5. JSPS research fellowship for young scientists [19J12641]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19J12641] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A PCR-based, bacterium-free method has been developed to generate SARS-CoV-2 infectious clones, allowing for a better understanding of the virus through the construction of reporter and mutant viruses.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although multiple mutations have been observed in SARS-CoV-2, functional analysis of each mutation of SARS-CoV-2 has been limited by the lack of convenient mutagenesis methods. In this study, we establish a PCR-based, bacterium-free method to generate SARS-CoV-2 infectious clones. Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 could be rescued at high titer with high accuracy after assembling 10 SARS-CoV-2 cDNA fragments by circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) and transfection of the resulting circular genome into susceptible cells. The construction of infectious clones for reporter viruses and mutant viruses could be completed in two simple steps: introduction of reporter genes or mutations into the desirable DNA fragments (similar to 5,000 base pairs) by PCR and assembly of the DNA fragments by CPER. This reverse genetics system may potentially advance further understanding of SARS-CoV-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据