4.6 Article

UK advanced practice nurses' experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044139

关键词

COVID-19; health & safety; health policy; rationing

资金

  1. Royal College of Nursing (RCN) [SRA861151]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to understand the experiences of APNs in the UK during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, with regards to safety, shortages, and retention. The results showed that UK-based APNs reported shortages in staff and PPE during the first 3 months of the outbreak, with almost half considering leaving their job. Despite challenges, there were positive changes in working practices that enhanced care.
Objective The aim of the study was to understand the experiences of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in the UK during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in relation to safety, shortages and retention. Design A cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey. Setting APNs in any UK setting. Participants The survey was sent to an existing UK-wide cohort of APNs. 124 APNs responded (51%). Results UK-based APNs in this study reported shortages of staff (51%) and personal protective equipment (PPE) (68%) during the first 3 months of the coronavirus outbreak. Almost half (47%) had considered leaving their job over the same 3 months. Despite difficulties, there were reports of positive changes to working practice that have enhanced care. Conclusion UK APNs report COVID-19-related shortages in staff and equipment across primary and secondary care and all regions of the UK. Shortages of PPE during a pandemic are known to be a factor in the development of mental health sequelae as well as a risk factor for increased turnover and retention issues. Half of APNs surveyed were considering a change in job. The UK risks a further crisis in staff morale and retention if this is not acknowledged and addressed. APNs also expressed concern about patients not receiving routine care as many specialties closed or reduced working during the crisis. However, there were also many examples of good practice, positive changes and innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据